Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Security for Home Computer Users: Protect yourself while travelling this summer


Security for Home Computer Users Newsletter


 


 


 


Welcome to Security for Home Computer Users--a monthly newsletter
bringing security news, guidance, updates, and community resources
directly to your inbox. If you would like to receive more technical
security information, please subscribe to the

Microsoft Security Newsletter
.




Protect yourself while travelling this summer


Protect yourself while travelling this summer

It's summer! The kids are out of school, and it's time to travel,
right? Just make sure to protect yourself. If you bring your
portable computer or mobile phone with you, start with
3
ways to protect your laptop on the road
or tips to

avoid wireless attacks through your Bluetooth cell phone
. If
you're travelling sans mobile devices, you'll find these other tips
helpful:



>
5 safety tips for using a public computer


>
Use public wireless networks more safely


 


How to get rid of spyware



Spyware Removal: How to Get Rid of Spyware



Many kinds of unwanted software, including spyware, are designed to be
difficult to remove. If you try to uninstall this software like any other
program, you might find that the program reappears as soon as you restart
your computer.


If you're having trouble uninstalling unwanted software, you may need
to download a tool to do the job for you. Several companies offer free and
low-cost software that will check your computer for spyware and other
unwanted software and help you remove it.


Some Internet Service Providers (ISPs) include antispyware software in
their service packages. Check with your ISP to see if they can recommend
or provide a tool. If your ISP doesn't offer a removal tool for spyware
and other unwanted software, ask people you trust to recommend one, or see
the links in step 1 below.


Keep in mind that removing unwanted software with these tools may mean
you will no longer be able to use a free program that came with the
spyware.


To remove spyware







1. Use Windows Defender. Windows Defender comes with

Windows Vista
. If you use Windows XP SP2, you can download

Windows Defender
for no charge.











Run the tool to scan your computer for spyware and other unwanted
software.
Review the files discovered by the tool for spyware and other
unwanted software.
Select suspicious files for removal by following the tool's
instructions.

Improve Web Safety. Protect Kids Online.


10 things you can teach kids to improve their Web safety

Before you allow your child to go online without your supervision, make sure you establish a set of rules that you can all agree on.

If you're not sure where to start, here are some ideas on what to discuss with your kids to teach them about using the Internet more safely.

1. Encourage your kids to share their Internet experiences with you. Enjoy the Internet along with your children.

2. Teach your kids to trust their instincts. If they feel nervous about anything online, they should tell you about it.

3. If your kids visit chat rooms, use instant messaging (IM) programs, online video games, or other activities on the Internet that require a login name to identify themselves, help them choose that name and make sure it doesn't reveal any personal information about them.

4. Insist that your kids never give out your address, phone number, or other personal information, including where they go to school or where they like to play.

5. Teach your kids that the difference between right and wrong is the same on the Internet as it is in real life.

6. Show your kids how to respect others online. Make sure they know that rules for good behavior don't change just because they're on a computer.

7. Insist that your kids respect the property of others online. Explain that making illegal copies of other people's work—music, video games, and other programs—is just like stealing it from a store.

8. Tell your kids that they should never meet online friends in person. Explain that online friends may not be who they say they are.

9. Teach your kids that not everything they read or see online is true. Encourage them to ask you if they're not sure.

10. Control your children's online activity with advanced Internet software. Parental controls can help you filter out harmful content, monitor the sites your child visits, and find out what they do there.

Is the Alexa Ranking correct?




 


Alexa's traffic
rankings are based on the usage patterns of Alexa Toolbar users over a rolling
3 month period. A site's ranking is based on a combined measure of reach &
pageviews. Reach is determined by the number of unique Alexa users who visit a
site on a given day. Pageviews are the total number of Alexa user URL requests
for a site. The site with the highest combination of users and pageviews is
ranked #1.




But is this
the correct way to judge or rank a website.





Apart from
the biased that it is based on the sample of Alexa tool bar users, it is
browser specific and it can be easily manipulated, the formula itself is
debatable.




We started
off by quoting the number of “Hits” for determining traffic of a website. But
eventually, we moved away from the term "hit" because everyone realized it was
pretty meaningless. A hit was often counted not just for a page load, but for
every element included on the page, as well. So if a site was less graphical
and had equal usage would register half the hits.





And then
came Reach and Pageviews.




As such, it
would not be fair to compare two websites that belong to different categories.
But measuring reach (number of unique visitors) is important because
mainstream advertisers want to reach a lot of people but not just the same
people over and over. It also gives an idea of popularity and growth of a
website.




Pageviews
became the primary metric not because they were more meaningful but because
they helped in closing Ads deals since Ads were sold primarily on a CPM basis
and its counts are as susceptible as hit counts to site design decisions that
have nothing to do with actual usage.





Someone has
brilliantly analyzed that the part of the reason MySpace drives such an
amazing number of pageviews is because their site design is so terrible.




As the way
we interact with the web is changing, and technology makes it easier for users
to have access to multimedia content on a single web page, are page views
still relevant? AJAX, RSS, Feeds, Widgets. Streaming etc. are making things
worse.




So what's a
better way for comparison? Good question.




As I have
mentioned earlier also, it is not fair to compare two websites that belong to
different categories. The measurement of success also varies from website to
website. So it could be registered users, files uploaded/downloaded, posts,
hits, searches, revenue, and it may even be pageviews. But internal metrics
aren't enough, since we want to compare ourselves to other players in the
market. So we also need some apples-to-apples comparison.





If I had to
pick one, in addition to unique visitors (reach), I'd say time spent would be
much more useful than pageviews.


Time spent
interacting with a site is a much better basis on which to compare sites'
relative ability to capture attention/value than pageviews is. Especially when
it comes to media like audio or video, an increasing percentage of the web
consumption, time obviously means a great deal more than a pageview.




However,
time is a bit harder to measure.





HTTP doesn't
actually have a concept of time spent. So if you read this whole post and then
click off to another site, my web server won't know whether you were here for
five minutes or five seconds. I don’t even know whether you have been reading
this post for last 10 mins or you are having a coffee with this page open in
your browser.




Finally,
there's a big argument against time as a measure:





People don't
spend much time on Google search, because it gives them what they want so
fast, and they go away (which is obviously good for them and for users). But
the average time spent per visit will be very low.





And just as
pageviews can be gamed, you can slow your users down unnecessarily (or
accidentally because your servers are too slow) and increase time spent.


In short,
there's no easy solution but there's a BIG opportunity (though very tough job)
for someone to come up with a meaningful metric that weighs a bunch of
factors.


 

Ten principles that contribute to a Google user experience

I got this article through an email from one of my colleague and I found it really interesting.

---------------------

1. Focus on people – their lives, their work, their dreams

The Google User Experience team works to discover people's actual needs, including needs they can't always articulate. Armed with that information, Google can create products that solve real-world problems and spark the creativity of all kinds of people. Improving people's lives, not just easing step-by-step tasks, is our goal.

Above all, a well-designed Google product is useful in daily life. It doesn't try to impress users with its whizbang technology or visual style – though it might have both. It doesn't strong-arm people to use features they don't want – but it does provide a natural growth path for those who are interested. It doesn't intrude on people's lives – but it does open doors for users who want to explore the world's information, work more quickly and creatively, and share ideas with their friends or the world.

2. Every millisecond counts

Nothing is more valuable than people's time. Google pages load quickly, thanks to slim code and carefully selected image files. The most essential features and text are placed in the easiest-to-find locations. Unnecessary clicks, typing, steps, and other actions are eliminated. Google products ask for information only once and include smart defaults. Tasks are streamlined.

Speed is a boon to users. It is also a competitive advantage that Google doesn't sacrifice without good reason.

3. Simplicity is powerful

Simplicity fuels many elements of good design, including ease of use, speed, visual appeal, and accessibility. But simplicity starts with the design of a product's fundamental functions. Google doesn't set out to create feature-rich products; our best designs include only the features that people need to accomplish their goals. Ideally, even products that require large feature sets and complex visual designs appear to be simple as well as powerful.

Google teams think twice before sacrificing simplicity in pursuit of a less important feature. Our hope is to evolve products in new directions instead of just adding more features.

4. Engage beginners and attract experts

Designing for many people doesn't mean designing for the lowest common denominator. The best Google designs appear quite simple on the surface but include powerful features that are easily accessible to those users who want them. Our intent is to invite beginners with a great initial experience while also attracting power users whose excitement and expertise will draw others to the product.

A well-designed Google product lets new users jump in, offers help when necessary, and ensures that users can make simple and intuitive use of the product's most valuable features. Progressive disclosure of advanced features encourages people to expand their usage of the product. Whenever appropriate, Google offers smart features that entice people with complex online lives – for instance, people who share data across several devices and computers, work online and off, and crave storage space.

5. Dare to innovate

Design consistency builds a trusted foundation for Google products, makes users comfortable, and speeds their work. But it is the element of imagination that transforms designs from ho-hum to delightful.

Google encourages innovative, risk-taking designs whenever they serve the needs of users. Our teams encourage new ideas to come out and play. Instead of just matching the features of existing products, Google wants to change the game.

6. Design for the world

The World Wide Web has opened all the resources of the Internet to people everywhere. For example, many users are exploring Google products while strolling with a mobile device, not sitting at a desk with a personal computer. Our goal is to design products that are contextually relevant and available through the medium and methods that make sense to users. Google supports slower connections and older browsers when possible, and Google allows people to choose how they view information (screen size, font size) and how they enter information (smart query parsing). The User Experience team researches the fundamental differences in user experiences throughout the world and works to design the right products for each audience, device, and culture. Simple translation, or "graceful degradation" of a feature set, isn't sufficient to meet people's needs.

Google is also committed to improving the accessibility of its products. Our desire for simple and inclusive products, and Google's mission to make the world's information universally accessible, demand products that support assistive technologies and provide a useful and enjoyable experience for everyone, including those with physical and cognitive limitations.

7. Plan for today's and tomorrow's business

Those Google products that make money strive to do so in a way that is helpful to users. To reach that lofty goal, designers work with product teams to ensure that business considerations integrate seamlessly with the goals of users. Teams work to make sure ads are relevant, useful, and clearly identifiable as ads. Google also takes care to protect the interests of advertisers and others who depend on Google for their livelihood.

Google never tries to increase revenue from a product if it would mean reducing the number of Google users in the future. If a profitable design doesn't please users, it's time to go back to the drawing board. Not every product has to make money, and none should be bad for business.

8. Delight the eye without distracting the mind

If people looked at a Google product and said "Wow, that's beautiful!" the User Experience team would cheer. A positive first impression makes users comfortable, assures them that the product is reliable and professional, and encourages people to make the product their own.

A minimalist aesthetic makes sense for most Google products because a clean, clutter-free design loads quickly and doesn't distract users from their goals. Visually appealing images, color, and fonts are balanced against the needs for speed, scannable text, and easy navigation. Still, "simple elegance" is not the best fit for every product. Audience and cultural context matter. A Google product's visual design should please its users and improve usability for them.

9. Be worthy of people's trust

Good design can go a long way to earn the trust of the people who use Google products. Establishing Google's reliability starts with the basics – for example, making sure the interface is efficient and professional, actions are easily reversed, ads are clearly identified, terminology is consistent, and users are never unhappily surprised. In addition, Google products open themselves to the world by including links to competitors and encouraging user contributions such as community maps or iGoogle gadgets.

A greater challenge is to make sure that Google demonstrates respect for users' right to own and control their own data. Google is transparent about how it uses information and never shares data outside Google without a user's explicit consent. Our products warn users about such dangers as insecure connections, different privacy policies on other websites, actions that may make users vulnerable to spam, or the possibility that data shared outside Google may be stored elsewhere. Google is reassuring but truthful about data sharing so that users can make informed choices. The larger Google becomes, the more essential it is to live up to our "Don't be evil" motto.

10. Add a human touch

Google includes a wide range of personalities, and our designs have personality, too. Text and design elements are friendly, quirky, and smart – and not boring, close-minded, or arrogant. Google text talks directly to people and offers the same practical, informal assistance that anyone would offer to a neighbor who asked a question. And Google doesn't let fun or personality interfere with other elements of a design, especially when people's livelihood, or their ability to find vital information, is at stake.

Google doesn't know everything, and no design is perfect. Our products ask for feedback, and Google acts on that feedback. When practicing these design principles, the Google User Experience team seeks the best possible balance in the time available for each product. Then the cycle of iteration, innovation, and improvement continues.

Allah o Akbar =

AAAD+nation